Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial reveals improved warning sign identification and prevention behaviors in elementary students, indicating the feasibility of early gatekeeper intervention.
Objective: This study aimed to develop and examine the effectiveness of a school-based gatekeeper training program for suicide prevention among upper-grade elementary school students. The program aimed to enhance the identification of suicide warning signs and suicide-risk situations, as well as promote suicideprevention (gatekeeper) behaviors.Methods: To evaluate the effectiveness of a school-based gatekeeper training program, a pretest-posttest control group design was used. A total of 230 5th- and 6th-grade elementary school students from 12 classes were randomly assigned to either experimental (n = 114) or control (n = 116) group after a pretest. The experimental group participated in a one-session gatekeeper training program, while the control group received no intervention. Posttests were administered to both groups after program completion. The final analytic sample comprised participants from the experimental (n = 101) and control (n = 107) groups. The data were analyzed using independent-samples t-tests, two-way repeated measures ANOVA and ηp2 to estimate effect sizes.Results: The program comprised two core components: (a) training children to identify suicide warning signs and suicide-risk situations, and (b) fostering gatekeeper behaviors. Children in the experimental group demonstrated significant improvements in both the accurate identification of suicide warning signs/risk situations and the adoption of gatekeeper behaviors. In contrast, the control group exhibited no significant changes on either outcome.Conclusion: This study outlines the content and core components of a school-based gatekeeper program based on children’s developmental characteristics. Furthermore, the program significantly enhanced children’s identification of suicide warning signs and suicide-risk situations while promoting the adoption of gatekeeper behaviors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: