Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study reveals opposing effects of vascular permeability and surface area on blood-brain barrier leakage in cerebral small vessel disease, highlighting distinct microvascular...
Background: In neurovascular and neurodegenerative diseases, blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption can be subtle, diffuse, and MRI-derived measures are confounded by microvascular architecture. Therefore, we aimed to disentangle MRI-derived blood-brain barrier leakage rate (K i ) into intrinsic vascular permeability (P) and surface area (S). Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 45 patients with cSVD and 26 elderly controls underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI to determine K i and vessel architecture imaging (VAI) to estimate S. These measures were used to calculate P. Results: Compared to normal-appearing white matter (NAWM), K i was higher in WMH (β=0.297, p<0.001) and deep gray matter (DGM) (β=0.210, p=0.007). P was higher in WMH (β=0.410, p<0.001) and similar between NAWM and DGM. S was smaller in WMH (β=-0.467, p<0.001) and larger in DGM (β=0.540, p<0.001). K i (β=0.289, p=0.007) and P (β=0.249, p=0.021) were only higher in patients than controls in concentric shells surrounding WMH. S was smaller in WMH of patients than controls (β=-0.085, p=0.049). With age, K i (β=0.260, p=0.008) and P increased (β=0.273, p<0.001), while S decreased (β=-0.079, p=0.025). Conclusion: Disentangling P and S from the BBB leakage rate provides two biologically more specific and interpretable measures, which have counteracting effects on the BBB leakage in aging and disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verstappen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: