Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey reveals gaps in data analysis skills and gender disparities in preventive medicine undergraduates, highlighting the need for targeted digital health curriculum reforms.
Digital literacy (DL) is increasingly recognized as a valuable competency for future healthcare professionals, yet its integration in preventive medicine curricula remains inconsistent. This study examined students’ DL familiarity and competencies to inform curriculum development. A cross-sectional anonymous survey was conducted among fourth- and fifth-year preventive medicine undergraduates at a single site (one institution) in China, Soochow University. A validated 10-item instrument assessed four dimensions: Digital Tool Proficiency, Information Search & Evaluation, Information Security & Privacy, and Digital Health Ethics & Application using a 5-point Likert scale. Confirmatory Factor Analysis validated the structure, and gender comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact tests and t-tests. Among 188 valid respondents (62.3% response rate), only 3.2% reported being “very familiar” with DL, while 29.8% were unfamiliar. Students showed high proficiency in document editing and basic information search (> 75% agree/strongly agree) but lower competency in data analysis software. Significant gender disparities emerged, with males demonstrating higher confidence in digital tools and information security ( P = 0.006). DL familiarity positively correlated with total scores ( r = 0.291, P < 0.05), and strong inter-dimensional correlations existed ( r = 0.477–0.680, P < 0.001). Preventive medicine curricula may benefit from enhanced DL integration, with particular attention to data analysis skills and digital health applications. Gender-informed teaching strategies warrant further exploration to cater to potential learning preferences. Given this single-site, one-institution design in China, transferability of considerations and recommendations is limited; multi-institutional studies are needed to determine if these patterns represent broader trends in preventive medicine education.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: