Comparative analysis reveals divergent Indo-Pacific strategies between India and Indonesia, highlighting the influence of international status perception and sub-regional integration dynamics.
The strategic approaches of regional powers to the Indo-Pacific remain under-researched. This article attempts to enhance our understanding by comparing India and Indonesia. At first glance, both countries share a number of similar general foreign policy traits (i.e. non-alignment), yet they approach the changing geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific rather differently. For example, while India has been a member of the Quad, Indonesia has remained fairly distant to U.S. led minilaterals in the Indo-Pacific, preferring ASEAN-centric multilateral cooperation instead. The article shows that these differences can be explained by taking into consideration two interrelated factors: The first factor pertains to how India and Indonesia perceive their own status in regional and international affairs, and how their status is perceived (and subsequently conferred or disavowed) by others. The second factor pertains to how India and Indonesia relate to their neighbors and their (sub)region, more specifically to their roles in regional integration processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heiduk et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: