Why the study?
Studies evaluating sex differences in clinical outcomes of single-vessel disease and multi-vessel disease in Korean patients with acute myocardial infarction are lacking.
Does sex difference impact clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction with single-vessel and multi-vessel disease?
Does sex difference impact clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction with single-vessel and multi-vessel disease?
Younger women (<65 years) with single-vessel acute myocardial infarction face a significantly higher risk of MACE than their male counterparts, highlighting a critical sex-specific risk disparity.
Background: Several studies have compared clinical outcomes according to sex in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, studies evaluating sex differences in clinical outcomes of single-vessel disease (SVD) and multi-vessel disease (MVD) in Korean patients with AMI are lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze sex differences in the clinical characteristics of patients with AMI with SVD and MVD and to evaluate the impact of sex differences on the clinical outcomes in patients with AMI with SVD and MVD. Methods: A total of 11,002 AMI patients from November 2011 to June 2015 in the Korea AMI Registry, National Institute of Health, were enrolled. The current study was retrospective observational study. Patients were divided into SVD (n=5,644) and MVD (n=5,358) groups, and clinical impact of sex difference were analyzed by propensity score matching analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression model. Results: 9.4%; hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.13; P=0.020) was higher in women with SVD aged <65 years. However, the incidence and risk of MACE were similar for men and women with MVD, and those with SVD aged ≥65 years. Conclusions: In the present study of Korean patients with AMI, women were older and exhibited a higher prevalence of comorbidities than men. Women with SVD aged <65 years had a significantly higher risk of MACE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yim et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: