Why the study?
What is the incidence of coagulation abnormalities in pre-eclamptic patients considered for epidural analgesia?
What is the incidence of coagulation abnormalities in pre-eclamptic patients considered for epidural analgesia?
Routine coagulation screening before epidural analgesia in pre-eclampsia may only be necessary in severe cases, starting with a platelet count.
May support limiting coagulation testing to severe pre-eclampsia; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
A questionnaire survey of current practice at a small cross-section of obstetric units, covering 22% of all United Kingdom deliveries, revealed a marked lack of standard practice regarding requests for coagulation screens on pre-eclamptic patients who require epidural procedures. A retrospective audit was therefore carried out on 434 coagulation screens requested for pre-eclamptic patients in whom epidural analgesia might have been considered. Borderline abnormalities of coagulation were found in only 10 patients (2%). Platelet counts of less than 150 x 10(9)/litre were present in 28% of cases. 'Significant' thrombocytopenia (less than 100 x 10(9)/litre) and all coagulation abnormalities were only encountered in severe pre-eclampsia (diastolic blood pressure of greater than 110 mmHg and proteinuria of + + or greater). Furthermore, coagulation abnormality was always associated with a reduced platelet count (mean, 97 x 10(9)/litre). This study would therefore support anaesthetic practice which restricted any requests for coagulation testing to severe pre-eclamptic patients only. For these patients first line testing could be limited to a platelet count.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barker et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: