Why the study?
Colorectal surgery carries a significant burden of postoperative complications and costs, prompting the evaluation of systematic clinical auditing to measure and improve clinical outcomes in a large area of northern Italy.
Does systematic clinical auditing improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery?
Does systematic clinical auditing improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery?
This protocol outlines a multicenter audit designed to measure and improve the quality of surgical care and clinical outcomes for colorectal cancer patients in northern Italy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Audit and feedback may shorten hospital stay after colorectal cancer surgery; leaves open whether broader adoption improves key outcomes.
PURPOSE: Surgery is the main treatment for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Despite huge improvements in perioperative care, colorectal surgery is still associated with a significant burden of postoperative complications and ultimately costs for healthcare organizations. Systematic clinical auditing activity has already proven to be effective in measuring and improving clinical outcomes, and for this reason, we decided to evaluate its impact in a large area of northern Italy. METHODS: The Emilia-Romagna Surgical Colorectal Audit (ESCA) is an observational, multicentric, retro-prospective study, carried out by 7 hospitals located in the Emilia-Romagna region. All consecutive patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer during a 54-month study period will be enrolled. Data regarding baseline conditions, preoperative diagnostic work-up, surgery and postoperative course will be collected in a dedicated case report form. Primary outcomes regard postoperative complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes include each center's adherence to the auditing (enrolment rate) and evaluation of the systematic feedback activity on key performance indicators for the entire perioperative process. CONCLUSION: This protocol describes the methodology of the Emilia-Romagna Surgical Colorectal Audit. The study will provide real-world clinical data essential for benchmarking and feedback activity, to positively impact outcomes and ultimately to improve the entire healthcare process of patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study ESCA is registered on the clinicaltrials.gov platform (Identifier: NCT03982641).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Massa et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: