Key result
Among elderly patients hospitalized for digoxin toxicity, 66% were prescribed digoxin for an inappropriate indication.
Observational (n=99)
No
Absolute Event Rate: 66% vs 33%
A high proportion (66%) of elderly patients hospitalized for digoxin toxicity were receiving the drug for inappropriate indications, highlighting the need for stricter adherence to prescribing guidelines.
May prompt review of digoxin indications in elderly; leaves open whether guideline adherence reduces toxicity hospitalizations.
BACKGROUND: Digoxin remains widely used today despite its narrow therapeutic index and toxicity. The objective of this study was to investigate the percentage of inappropriate use of digoxin and long-term outcomes of elderly patients hospitalized for digoxin toxicity. METHODS: The study included 99 consecutive patients hospitalized for digoxin toxicity. The other study criteria for the inappropriate use of digoxin was regarded if participants having depressed left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction < 45%) who were not on optimal medical therapy including beta-blocker and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor therapy or if participants having permanent AF who were not on optimal beta-blocker therapy. RESULTS: Appropriate digoxin usage was confirmed in 33 of patients in spite of its narrow therapeutic index. A total of 16 of 99 patients died, with a mean follow-up time of 22.1 ± 10.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to popular belief, the rate of inappropriate digoxin usage remains high. On account of its narrow therapeutic index and toxicity, digoxin should be used more carefully according to the current evidence and guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tatlısu et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Digoxin toxicity (n=99). Inappropriate digoxin use vs. Appropriate digoxin use was evaluated on Inappropriate digoxin usage. Among elderly patients hospitalized for digoxin toxicity, 66% were prescribed digoxin for an inappropriate indication.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: