Why the study?
What is the profile of heart failure patients susceptible to digitalis intoxication in a public health unit?
What is the profile of heart failure patients susceptible to digitalis intoxication in a public health unit?
A high proportion of heart failure patients on digoxin have out-of-range plasma levels, highlighting the critical need for routine monitoring, particularly in males, those with advanced functional class, and renal dysfunction.
Suggests targeted digoxin monitoring may reduce risk in vulnerable HF patients; leaves open whether systematic screening alters outcomes in resource-limited settings.
Digoxin is used for heart failure associated to systolic dysfunction and high ventricular rate. It has a narrow therapeutic range and intoxication may occur due to drug interactions or comorbidities. The aim of this work was to study digoxin use in a public health unit delineating the profile of patients susceptible to digitalis intoxication. Medical records belonging to patients admitted to the cardiomyopathy ward of the health unit (2009-2010) and in use of digoxin were analyzed. Among 647 patients admitted, 185 individuals using digoxin and possessed records available. The registration of plasma digoxin concentration was found in 80 records and it was out of the therapeutic range in 42 patients (52.5%). This group of individuals was constituted mainly by males patients (79%), functional class III of heart failure (65%), exhibiting renal failure (33%). The evaluated sample reflects the epidemiology of heart failure in Brazil and, although pharmacotherapy had been according to Brazilian Guidelines, apparently the monitoring was not performed as recommended. This work highlighs the necessity of plasma digoxin constant monitoring during pharmacotherapy and the development of protocols that enable a safer use, especially in male patients, functional class III and with renal dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Souza et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: