Why the study?
Can systolic time intervals (PEP/LVET) measured from the carotid pulse curve indicate ventricular function and disease severity in children with various heart diseases?
Can systolic time intervals (PEP/LVET) measured from the carotid pulse curve indicate ventricular function and disease severity in children with various heart diseases?
Systolic time intervals, specifically PEP/LVET, provide a non-invasive method to assess and monitor ventricular function in children with various congenital and acquired heart diseases.
Supports non-invasive pediatric ventricular assessment via PEP/LVET; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Of the systolic time intervals, the preejection period is known to correlate well with invasively measured isometric contraction time, and increase of the quotient preejection period/left ventricular ejection time (PEP/LVET) is considered to be of a good indicator of left ventricular failure. The different systolic time intervals have been recorded from the carotid pulse curve from 40 normal children, 20 aged five and 20 aged ten years. Their PEP/LVET was 0.31 +/- 0.04. Seventy-eight children with different heart diseases were then investigated. In patients with congenital total heart block or extrasystoles, there was a negative correlation between PEP/LVET and the R-R interval, in accordance with the Frank-Starling law. In patients with ventricular septal defects PEP/LVET differentiates between small and large shunts; the increased PEP/LVET of the latter normalizes after operation. The increased PEP/RVET of children with transposition of the great arteries is an expression of the inadequacy of the right ventricle as a systemic chamber. In aortic stenosis "normalization" of a previously decreased PEP/LVET may indicate early left ventricular failure. In primary myocardial disease registration of the systolic time intervals enables us to follow the left ventricular function more closely than is possible with invasive techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gunnel Hedvall (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: