Key result
Cutaneous/subcutaneous Ewing sarcoma was associated with a lower metastasis rate (10% vs 37%) and higher overall survival (HR 0.33, P=0.013) compared to other sites.
Why the study?
Due to the rarity of cutaneous/subcutaneous Ewing sarcoma, its clinical characteristics remain poorly understood.
Does cutaneous/subcutaneous Ewing sarcoma have different clinical characteristics and prognosis compared to Ewing sarcoma at other anatomical sites?
Cohort (n=154)
No
Does cutaneous/subcutaneous Ewing sarcoma have different clinical characteristics and prognosis compared to Ewing sarcoma at other anatomical sites?
Hazard Ratio: 0.33
p-value: p=0.013
Patients with cutaneous/subcutaneous Ewing sarcoma have a significantly better prognosis than those with Ewing sarcoma at other anatomical sites.
May support more favorable outcomes in cutaneous/subcutaneous Ewing sarcoma; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: Given the rarity of cutaneous/subcutaneous Ewing sarcoma, their clinical characteristics remain poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to analyse the clinical characteristics of patients with cutaneous/subcutaneous Ewing sarcoma and review the treatment strategy. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data of 154 patients with Ewing sarcoma who were treated at our hospital between 2005 and 2019. Amongst these patients, 21 patients with cutaneous/subcutaneous Ewing sarcoma were analysed. As a basic strategy, patients with localized disease received intensive chemotherapy (vincristine-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide/ifosfamide-etoposide), followed by definitive surgery with or without radiotherapy. In total, 15 patients underwent pre-diagnostic resection with macroscopic residue (seven patients) or non-macroscopic residue (eight patients) before intensive chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median tumour length of the measurable lesions was 3.2 cm, and the ratio of metastasis was significantly lower than the Ewing sarcoma of other anatomical sites (10% vs. 37%, P = 0.013). Despite the pre-diagnostic resection, local recurrence after additional resection and/or adjuvant radiotherapy did not occur in any of the patients with localized disease. Overall survival was significantly higher in patients with cutaneous/subcutaneous Ewing sarcoma than in patients with Ewing sarcoma of other anatomical sites (hazard ratio = 0.33, P = 0.013). The event-free survival rate of cutaneous/subcutaneous Ewing sarcoma was also superior to that of Ewing sarcoma of other anatomical sites (hazard ratio = 0.35, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cutaneous/subcutaneous Ewing sarcoma may have better prognosis than those with Ewing sarcoma at other anatomical sites. Although pre-diagnostic resection without appropriate investigations is not recommended, local control may be recovered by using a combination of additional resection, chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aiba et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Ewing sarcoma (n=154). Cutaneous/subcutaneous Ewing sarcoma vs. Ewing sarcoma of other anatomical sites was evaluated on Overall survival (HR 0.33, p=0.013). Cutaneous/subcutaneous Ewing sarcoma was associated with a lower metastasis rate (10% vs 37%) and higher overall survival (HR 0.33, P=0.013) compared to other sites.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: