The 33rd Rovenstine Lecture

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

To examine trends in scientific publishing, editorial standards, and academic research training in anesthesiology from the perspective of the journal's Editor in Chief.
Analyzed manuscript acceptance patterns between laboratory and clinical research submissions to the journal Anesthesiology.
Evaluated the institutional distribution of peer-reviewed scientific articles published in the journal from United States departments between July 1992 and June 1994.
Assessed editorial oversight standards, industry-sponsored trial designs, and structural mentorship programs across academic medical centers.
Demonstrated higher publication rates for laboratory studies than clinical investigations, linked to early grant-driven peer review and rigorous experimental controls.
Observed heavy institutional concentration, with 59% of US research papers originating from 11 departments and 75% from just 20 institutions.
Identified critical clinical trial weaknesses—including inadequate sample size, poor randomization, and protocol redundancy—that require direct mentorship and integration of Ph.D. scientists into clinical departments.

Design

Editorial

Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.

A historical and editorial lecture discussing the role of the Editor in Chief of ANESTHESIOLOGY and the importance of mentoring in research.

No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Lawrence J. Saidman (1995) studied this question.

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share