Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We examined the effects of cysteamine and dimethylsulfoxide on the lethality of iododeoxyuridine-labeled HeLa cells irradiated with 150 kV x-rays (effective energy was 48 keV) and compared with those irradiated with 60Co gamma-rays. The protectable fraction was estimated from the regression lines for the reciprocal plots of the concentration of protectors, versus the degree of protection. The protectable fraction by cysteamine was 9.4% lower in iododeoxyuridine-labeled cells than in control cells when they were irradiated with x-rays, whereas no such difference was observed with dimethylsulfoxide. The slopes of the regression lines were steeper (i.e., more difficult to protect) for both protectors in iododeoxyuridine-labeled cells irradiated with x-rays. No such differences were observed in gamma-irradiated cells. The cause for these differences are attributable to Auger enhancement. The results suggest that at least a portion of Auger enhancement is not protectable by cysteamine and is hard to be protected by both protectors cysteamine and dimethylsulfoxide.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shinohara et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: