Why the study?
Does the method of data collection (face-to-face vs postal) affect reported health-related quality of life in patients five years post-CABGS?
Observational (n=128)
Does the method of data collection (face-to-face vs postal) affect reported health-related quality of life in patients five years post-CABGS?
Absolute Event Rate: 45.8% vs 30.8%
p-value: p=<.001
Patients report generally good HRQoL and remain relatively asymptomatic 5 years post-CABG, though the method of data collection (face-to-face vs postal) significantly influences reported physical health scores.
BACKGROUND: The number of individuals undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABGS) to treat coronary artery disease is steadily increasing. AIM: The purpose of the study was to describe the cohort's characteristics, their angina and breathless symptoms and report health-related quality of life (HRQoL) five years after CABGS. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight patients participated in the follow-up study using the quality of life Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Angina and breathless symptoms were also recorded. RESULTS: One hundred and nine patients were interviewed (face-to-face) and 19 completed postal questionnaires. The SF-36 component summaries of the face-to-face patients indicated that their physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) health was relatively good (45.8 and 53.6, respectively, with 0=worst health and 100=best health and 50 being the mean score), compared to the postal patients' mean PCS of 30.8 (p<.001). The postal MCS was also lower but not statistically significant (49.6, p=.081). At follow-up, the majority of patients were asymptomatic in terms of angina and breathlessness compared to their pre-operative status. CONCLUSION: The findings demonstrate that patient perceived HRQoL five years after CABGS is generally good and patients remain relatively asymptomatic although data collection methods highlight differences in physical HRQoL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Geraldine Lee (2007) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease post CABGS (n=128). Face-to-face interview vs. Postal questionnaire was evaluated on SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) (p=<.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: