Key result
Recent trials indicate that systemic thrombolysis for submassive pulmonary embolism reduces early mortality and hemodynamic collapse but increases the risk of major hemorrhage.
Why the study?
Does systemic thrombolytic therapy improve clinical outcomes in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism compared with anticoagulation alone?
Does systemic thrombolytic therapy improve clinical outcomes in patients with submassive pulmonary embolism compared with anticoagulation alone?
Systemic thrombolysis in submassive pulmonary embolism offers hemodynamic and survival benefits but carries a significant risk of major hemorrhage, necessitating careful patient selection.
] Recently, several studies have addressed thrombolytic therapy in patients with submassive PE. The Pulmonary Embolism International Thrombolysis (PEITHO) trial reported a substantial reduction in the combined endpoint of early mortality or hemodynamic collapse in patients receiving systemic thrombolysis (compared with heparin alone) at the expense of a significant increase in major hemorrhage (including intracranial hemorrhage). This was particularly evident among elderly patients aged >75 years. In the much smaller Tenecteplase or Placebo: Cardiopulmonary Outcomes At Three Months (TOPCOAT) study, which was terminated prematurely, the composite primary outcome (5-day survival to hospital discharge without shock, intubation, or major hemorrhage; 90-day rate of normal right ventricular function, 6-minute walk distance >330 m, no dyspnea at rest, and no recurrent PE or deep vein thrombosis) was positive in the patients randomized to thrombolysis compared with the low-molecular-weight heparin patients. Another small study comparing thrombolytic therapy with heparin alone demonstrated a decrease in the composite endpoint of death, recurrent venous thromboembolism, right ventricular dysfunction, and major hemorrhage at 6 months in the group randomized to thrombolytic therapy. 9 In the Moderate Pulmonary Embolism Treated with Thrombolysis (MOPPETT) trial, half-dose systemic thrombolytic therapy resulted in longterm reduction in the incidence of pulmonary hypertension compared with anticoagulation alone without excess bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weinberg et al. (2013) conducted a review in Submassive pulmonary embolism. Thrombolytic therapy vs. Heparin or anticoagulation alone was evaluated. Recent trials indicate that systemic thrombolysis for submassive pulmonary embolism reduces early mortality and hemodynamic collapse but increases the risk of major hemorrhage.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: