Why the study?
What is the incidence and natural history of atrial septal defect following balloon mitral valvuloplasty in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis?
What is the incidence and natural history of atrial septal defect following balloon mitral valvuloplasty in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis?
Atrial septal defects are common immediately after balloon mitral valvuloplasty but are hemodynamically insignificant and spontaneously close in the vast majority of patients within 3 months.
Post-BMV ASDs are usually transient; supports expectant management but leaves open long-term outcomes in persistent cases.
Fifty patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis aged twelve to thirty-six (twenty +/- six) years were studied by two-dimensional, pulsed and color Doppler echocardiography during, seventy-two hours after, and biweekly for three months after balloon mitral valvuloplasty (BMV). Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) done immediately after BMV (in the catheterization laboratory) detected a new atrial septal defect (ASD) in 46 (92%) patients. These measured 1 to 2 (mean 1.2 +/- 0.3) mm in diameter. Doppler color flow mapping guided the location of the ASD in most of the cases. A narrow jet of left-to-right shunt could be evaluated by pulsed Doppler studies. Velocity time integral (VTI) of the jet across one cardiac cycle and the diameter of the ASD were used to calculate the left-to-right shunt (shunt = VTI x pi (D/2)2 x heart rate). The estimated shunt was 0.04-0.39 (mean 0.20 +/- 0.10) L/minute. A repeat study at seventy-two hours revealed the defect in 40 (80%) patients. At three months, the defect persisted in only 5 (10%) cases. The mean interval of closure of ASD was 4.6 +/- 2.2 weeks. The authors conclude: (1) ASD occurs commonly after BMV, (2) the septal defect and the resultant left-to-right shunt are insignificant, and (3) ASD disappears in the majority of cases by three months after BMV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arora et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: