Key result
TAK-442 at total daily doses of 40 to 160 mg had similar efficacy to enoxaparin (primary endpoint incidence 10.6%-28.8% across doses vs 14.9%) for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty.
Why the study?
Does TAK-442 reduce the composite of all-cause mortality, DVT, and PE in patients undergoing elective knee arthroplasty compared to enoxaparin?
Population
1038 males and females 18 years of age or older undergoing elective unilateral total knee arthroplasty.
Comparison
TAK-442 40 or 80 mg oral once daily, or 10, 20… vs Enoxaparin 30 mg subcutaneous twice daily for 10…
Design
RCT, randomly assigned to 1 of 7 treatment groups, Enoxaparin was given…
Follow-up
30 days after the last dose of study drug
Authors
Loading...
Supports oral factor Xa inhibition as alternative to enoxaparin post-TKA; confirms comparable efficacy in RCT.
RCT (n=1,038)
Double-blind for TAK-442, open-label for enoxaparin
randomly assigned
Yes
Does TAK-442 reduce the composite of all-cause mortality, DVT, and PE in patients undergoing elective knee arthroplasty compared to enoxaparin?
In patients undergoing total knee replacement, the oral factor Xa inhibitor TAK-442 at daily doses of 40 to 160 mg demonstrated similar efficacy and safety to enoxaparin.
Weitz et al. (2009) conducted an RCT in elective unilateral total knee arthroplasty (n=1,038). TAK-442 vs. enoxaparin 30 mg BID was evaluated on composite of all-cause mortality, symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT, and pulmonary embolism (PE). TAK-442 at total daily doses of 40 to 160 mg had similar efficacy to enoxaparin (primary endpoint incidence 10.6%-28.8% across doses vs 14.9%) for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: