Key result
Genomic variations and genetic predisposition to surgical trauma may influence the incidence and severity of adverse outcomes after cardiovascular surgery.
Why the study?
Do genomic variations influence adverse outcomes in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery?
Do genomic variations influence adverse outcomes in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery?
Genomic variations may serve as future diagnostic tools for risk stratification in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.
Does not yet support genetic testing for surgical risk stratification; leaves open hypothesis-generating role of genomics in cardiovascular outcomes.
Recent findings in molecular research suggest that the outcome of cardiovascular surgery is at least partly determined by the individual patient's genetic predisposition to react to surgical trauma and extracorporal circulation. The activation of cellular as well as humoral cascades occurs in the perioperative period, and influences the extent of pro- and anticoagulation and pro- and anti-inflammation. These events contribute to the incidence and severity of perioperative ischaemia or organ dysfunction, and thus determine adverse outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Candidate genes that are possibly involved in the development of adverse outcomes not only consist of genes relevant to the field of coagulation and inflammation, but also genes functioning in lipid metabolism, ion channels, membrane integrity and others. Genomic variations may prove to serve as future diagnostic tools for the risk stratification of patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stüber et al. (2002) conducted a review in Cardiovascular surgery. Genomic variations was evaluated. Genomic variations and genetic predisposition to surgical trauma may influence the incidence and severity of adverse outcomes after cardiovascular surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology