Key result
Bepridil prevented or significantly slowed sustained ventricular tachycardia in 11 of 12 experiments, whereas nifedipine failed in 0 of 9 experiments and often accelerated arrhythmias.
Why the study?
Does bepridil compared to nifedipine prevent induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias in a post-myocardial infarction dog model?
Does bepridil compared to nifedipine prevent induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias in a post-myocardial infarction dog model?
Absolute Event Rate: 91.7% vs 0%
In a post-infarction dog model, bepridil prevented induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias by prolonging refractoriness, whereas nifedipine paradoxically accelerated arrhythmias.
No clinical adoption warranted from canine data; leaves open translation of bepridil's antiarrhythmic effects to human VT prevention.
The effects of the two calcium antagonists bepridil and nifedipine on induced ventricular tachyarrhythmias were studied by programmed electrical stimulation in 15 dogs, 4-8 days after myocardial infarction. Recordings from the infarcted and normal anterior wall of the left ventricle were obtained with an epicardial implanted 'composite' electrode. Bepridil (5 mg/kg) or nifedipine (0.025 mg/kg) were administered i.v. on different days and testing was repeated. Sustained ventricular tachycardia was prevented or significantly slowed by bepridil in 11/12 experiments compared with none of 9 experiments with nifedipine. Paradoxically, in 10/15 dogs nifedipine accelerated arrhythmias or even provoked ventricular fibrillation. Bepridil prolonged refractoriness of infarcted myocardium by 15 +/- 4% (mean +/- SD, p less than 0.01), which was greater than the increase it produced in the effective refractory period of normal tissue (9.0 +/- 3.8%) or QTc interval (11 +/- 5.5%). In contrast, nifedipine significantly shortened these parameters. Both drugs did not influence conduction in infarcted and normal zones as indicated by unchanged late potentials, QRS duration and normal-zone electrograms, respectively. The data indicate that the antiarrhythmic action of bepridil was predominantly related to the prolongation of ventricular refractoriness and repolarization (class III effects).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brachmann et al. (2008) studied Ventricular tachyarrhythmias induced in the late postinfarction phase (n=15). Bepridil vs. Nifedipine (0.025 mg/kg i.v.) was evaluated on Prevention or significant slowing of sustained ventricular tachycardia. Bepridil prevented or significantly slowed sustained ventricular tachycardia in 11 of 12 experiments, whereas nifedipine failed in 0 of 9 experiments and often accelerated arrhythmias.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: