Key result
The transdermal bisoprolol patch reduced 24-hour premature ventricular contraction density to a similar extent as oral bisoprolol (median 7.6% vs 4.6%, p=0.73) in patients with idiopathic frequent PVCs.
Why the study?
The transdermal bisoprolol patch was designed to maintain sustained plasma concentrations with higher trough levels than oral bisoprolol, but comparative efficacy in patients with idiopathic PVCs was unknown.
Does transdermal bisoprolol patch reduce PVC density compared to oral bisoprolol in patients with idiopathic frequent premature ventricular contractions?
Observational (n=78)
No
Does transdermal bisoprolol patch reduce PVC density compared to oral bisoprolol in patients with idiopathic frequent premature ventricular contractions?
The transdermal bisoprolol patch is as effective as oral bisoprolol in reducing idiopathic PVCs, with potentially better efficacy for heart rate-dependent PVCs during night-time.
The transdermal bisoprolol patch (TB) was designed to maintain a sustained concentration of bisoprolol in plasma by a higher trough concentration than oral bisoporolol (OB). We compared the efficacy between TB and OB in patients with idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) while considering their duration of action.A total of 78 patients with a PVC count of ≥ 3,000 beats/24 hours were divided into groups treated with TB 4 mg (n = 43) or OB 2.5 mg (n = 35). PVCs were divided into positive heart rate (HR) -dependent PVCs (P-PVCs) and non-positive HR-dependent PVCs (NP-PVCs) based on the relationship between the hourly PVC density and hourly mean HR. Twenty-four-hour Holter electrocardiograms were performed before and 1 to 3 months after the initiation of therapy.There were no significant between-group differences in the baseline characteristics. Both the TB (from 14.6 [9.9-19.2] to 7.6 [1.7-15.8]%, P < 0.001) and OB (from 13.2 [7.6-21.9] to 4.6 [0.5-17.0]%, P = 0.0041) significantly decreased the PVC density, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.73). Compared to OB, the TB had similar effects in reducing the PVC density for P-PVCs (P = 0.96), and NP-PVCs (P = 0.71). The TB significantly decreased the P-PVC density from baseline not only during day-time (P < 0.001) but also night-time (P = 0.0017), while the OB did not significantly decrease the P-PVC density from baseline during night-time (P = 0.17).Compared to OB, the TB could be used with the same efficacy of reducing idiopathic PVCs. The TB may be a more useful therapeutic agent than OB for P-PVCs during a 24-hour period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shinohara et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Idiopathic frequent premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) (n=78). Transdermal bisoprolol patch vs. Oral bisoprolol 2.5 mg once daily was evaluated on Post-treatment 24-hour premature ventricular contraction (PVC) density (%) (p=0.73). The transdermal bisoprolol patch reduced 24-hour premature ventricular contraction density to a similar extent as oral bisoprolol (median 7.6% vs 4.6%, p=0.73) in patients with idiopathic frequent PVCs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: