Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aims This study explored employees’ understanding of, and psychosocial responses to, workplace genetic testing (wGT) results.Materials & methods Employees of a US healthcare system who underwent wGT (hereditary cancer/heart disease risk, pharmacogenomics) and received results were surveyed. We ascertained pretest education engagement, test understanding, and psychosocial responses. Regression analyses identified predictors of scores on a modified Feelings About genomiC Test Results questionnaire (positive feelings, negative emotions, and uncertainty after wGT).Results N = 418 employees (mean age = 44 years; 88.3% female; 80.6% white) completed the survey. Mean scores (out of 12; higher scores indicate a greater extent of each feeling) were 5.2 (SD = 2.9) for positive feelings, 1.2 (SD = 2.2) for negative emotions, and 2.0 (SD = 2.5) for uncertainty. Identifying as non-Hispanic African American/Black and receiving increased risk (cancer/heart disease) wGT results were associated with lower positive feelings and higher negative emotions and uncertainty scores (all p < 0.05). Open-ended responses indicated difficulty interpreting, recalling, and utilizing results.Conclusions wGT was associated with low levels of measured psychosocial harm among participants. However, results suggested a greater likelihood of negative psychosocial responses among those with increased risk of cancer/heart disease and non-Hispanic African American/Black employees. Future studies should explore strategies to ensure all employees undergoing wGT have educational and psychosocial support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Charnysh et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: