Key result
Local thrombolysis was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality compared to systemic thrombolysis in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism (P = .003).
Why the study?
The prognosis after local thrombolysis compared to systemic thrombolysis in high-risk pulmonary embolism required evaluation.
Does local thrombolysis improve prognosis and reduce mortality compared to systemic thrombolysis in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism?
Observational (n=73)
No
Does local thrombolysis improve prognosis and reduce mortality compared to systemic thrombolysis in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism?
Local thrombolysis may reduce in-hospital mortality and improve long-term residual pulmonary hypertension compared to systemic thrombolysis in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism.
Local thrombolysis was associated with total shock remission in high-risk PE; leaves open superiority over systemic therapy pending randomized trials.
To evaluate the prognosis after local thrombolysis compared to systemic thrombolysis in high-risk pulmonary embolism. Observational study during 13 years which included 37 patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism treated with local thrombolysis and 36 patients with systemic thrombolysis (streptokinase, 250 000 UI/30 minutes followed by 100 000 UI/h). Cardiogenic shock has totally remitted in the group with local thrombolysis ( P = .002). The decrease in pressure gradient between right ventricle and right atrium was comparable in both groups in the acute period (the results being influenced by the higher in-hospital mortality after systemic thrombolysis), but significantly better in the next 24 months follow-up after in situ thrombolysis. Major and minor bleeding did not have significant differences. In hospital, mortality was significantly lower in the group with local thrombolysis ( P = .003), but for the next 24 months follow-up, the survival was comparable in both groups. Local thrombolysis, during the hospitalization, was associated with lower mortality rate comparing with systemic thrombolysis. In the next 24 months follow-up, the evolution of residual pulmonary hypertension was significantly better after in situ thrombolysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Macovei et al. (2020) conducted an observational in High-risk pulmonary embolism (n=73). Local thrombolysis vs. Systemic thrombolysis was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (p=.003). Local thrombolysis was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality compared to systemic thrombolysis in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism (P = .003).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: