Why the study?
Does miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass improve outcomes compared to conventional CPB or OPCAB in adults undergoing cardiac surgery?
Does miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass improve outcomes compared to conventional CPB or OPCAB in adults undergoing cardiac surgery?
This review discusses the rationale, published results, and strategies for incorporating miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass into adult cardiac surgical practice.
Leaves open whether miniaturized CPB improves outcomes over conventional techniques; hypothesis-generating for integration strategies in adult cardiac surgery.
The development of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and open heart surgery in the 1950s has benefited millions of people around the world over the last half century. However, it has been recognized since the beginning that there are detrimental effects to CPB. In an effort to minimize the effects of CPB, a miniaturized CPB (M-CPB) closed circuit system also known as closed circuit extracorporeal circulation (CCECC) has been developed as a strategy. In this review, we will look at the rationale behind the development of the miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass circuits, the published results in comparison to both conventional CPB (C-CPB), and off pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (OPCAB), and the surgical and perfusion strategies to incorporate this technique into everyday adult cardiac surgical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Subhasis Chatterjee (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: