Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, we compare two kernel-based tests for testing the closeness between two unknown density functions, one test has a smoothing parameter h that goes to zero as sample size tends to infinity, the other one has a fixed smoothing parameter. We show that the former test (with a shrinking h) can be more powerful than the later for “singular” local alternatives considered by Rosenblatt (1975). We also demonstrate that bootstrap procedure provide a better approximation than the asymptotic normal approximation. Monte Carlo simulations are reported to examine the finite sample performances of the nonparametric kernel-based tests based on both the asymptotic and bootstrap critical values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qi Li (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: