Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the effect of nicotine-containing vapes compared with traditional tobacco smoking on markers of vascular wall damage, including hsCRP, albuminuria, and ankle-brachial index.
Do nicotine-containing vapes and traditional tobacco smoking increase markers of vascular wall damage in young subjects without cardiovascular disease?
Do nicotine-containing vapes and traditional tobacco smoking increase markers of vascular wall damage in young subjects without cardiovascular disease?
Both vaping and traditional tobacco smoking are associated with early markers of vascular damage, including elevated hsCRP, increased albuminuria, and reduced ankle-brachial index in healthy young adults.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vaping and smoking may signal early vascular injury in healthy youth; observational data leaves open causal risks and practice implications.
Aim: to investigate the effect of nicotine-containing vapes in comparison with traditional tobacco smoking on markers of vascular wall damage: high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), albuminuria (AU), and ankle-brachial index (ABI). Material and Methods: We examined 369 young subjects without cardiovascular diseases (age median 21 [20;21] years) (159 men and 210 women). The hsCRP levels in the serum were assessed by immunochromatographic express method. AU was investigated in daily urine by a quantitative reflex photometry. ABI was determined by plethysmography. Results: All subjects were divided into groups: non-smokers (n=196, 53.1%), smokers of traditional cigarettes (n=83, 22.5%) and smokers of nicotine-containing vapes (n=90, 24.4%). The groups did not differ in main anthropometric data. Median hsCRP levels in smokers (14.30 [11; 16.5] mg/l in tobacco-smokers and 13.15 [9.65; 17.5] mg/l in vapers) were significantly higher vs nonsmokers (3.0 [2; 5.6] mg/l). In tobacco-smokers (33.0 [21.5; 60] mg) and vape smokers (45.0 [20; 115] mg), the median AU was statistically significantly higher than in non-smokers (12.0 [10; 20] mg). ABI levels were significantly lower in the groups of tobacco smokers (0.98 [0.91; 0.99]) and vapers (0.85 [0.79; 0.93]) when compared with nonsmokers (1.125 [1.01; 1.18]), and the median ABI in vapers was lower than in tobacco smokers (p<0.001). In the group of tobacco smokers, the hsCRP level correlated with the smoker's index (rs=0.31, p<0.05), and AU (rs=0.54, p<0.05) and ABI (rs=-0.28, p<0.05) with a daily inhaled nicotine dose. In the group of vapers, CRP was associated with smoking experience (rs=0.338, p<0.05), AU with a daily inhaled nicotine dose (rs=0.79, p<0.05), and ABI with BMI (rs=-0.33, p<0.05), heart rate (rs=-0.24, p<0.05) and smoking experience (rs=-0.235, p<0.05). According to the results of multivariate regression analysis the hsCRP level was related with only the smoking experience (B=0.91±0.19, p=0.000005), AU level with the daily inhaled nicotine dose (B=1.59±0.7, p=0.0121) and smoking experience (B=3.07±1.23, p=0.0179), and ABI level with only smoking experience (B=-0.09±0.004, p=0.0419). Conclusion: In smokers, both traditional and vapers, the levels of hsCRP, AU are significantly higher, and the ABI is lower than in healthy young nonsmokers. The most significant influence on the level of hsCRP is exerted by the experience of tobacco and vape smoking; to the AU level – the experience of tobacco and vaping and the daily inhaled nicotine dose, and by the value of the ABI – the experience of vaping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Подзолков et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: