Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To improve the deactivation of the sorbent for the removal of SO 2 in residue fluid catalytic cracking plants, a Ce−Fe−MgO sorbent with excellent sulfur removal capacity and regeneration ability was modified by adding new promoters such as Ti, Al, and Zr. The sorbents were prepared by a coprecipitation method, and their sulfur removal capacities and regeneration abilities were measured in a fixed-bed reactor during multiple cycles. In particular, the sulfur removal capacity of the CeFeMgTi sorbent showed a high absorption value (41.2 g of sulfur/g of absorbent × 100) and excellent regeneration ability during multiple cycles. These results can be explained by the difference in their crystal structures and the physical and textural properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: