Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nitric oxide (NO) is generated from the guanidine group of L-arginine by NO synthases (NOS) in a wide variety of tissues, including endocrine organs. In order to discriminate between central and local effects of NO-related agents on the pituitary-testicular axis, adult rats were injected intraperitoneally with 1 g/kg body weight (bw) L-arginine methyl ester (L-AME, an exogenous substrate of NOS), 0.5 mg/kg bw sodium nitroprusside (SNP, an NO donor) or vehicle (0.9% NaCl) or intratesticularly with 2 mg/testis L-AME, 2 micrograms/testis SNP or 25 microliters vehicle, and killed at 60 or 120 min after treatment. Both intraperitoneal and intratesticular administration of L-AME had the same effects: a decrease in the serum concentrations of LH and testosterone and in those of testosterone in the testicular interstitial fluid. However, treatment with SNP was more effective when given intratesticularly, inducing a decrease in serum and interstitial fluid testosterone concentrations, without significant changes in LH concentrations. Furthermore, when rats were injected intraperitoneally with 4 mg L-AME (the same dose as that given intratesticularly), serum LH concentrations were not changed. In addition, L-AME administration was not effective in modifying serum LH concentrations in castrated rats. To test the possible role of Leydig cells, the effects of systemic administration of L-AME were studied in rats depleted of Leydig cells by treatment with ethylene dimethane sulphonate. In these animals L-AME significantly decreased serum LH concentrations. To study the role of macrophages in this system, rats depleted of testicular macrophages by the liposome-suicide approach were injected intraperitoneally (1 g/kg bw) or intratesticularly (2 mg/testis) with L-AME or vehicle, 10 days after macrophage depletion, and killed at 120 min after treatment. The effects of L-AME on serum LH concentrations were blocked when the drug was administered intratesticularly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gaytán et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: