Significant differences in myocardial fiber structure exist between mice, rabbits, and sheep, suggesting caution when extrapolating cardiac functional models across species.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demands caution extrapolating fiber-based models across species; leaves open their impact on cardiac function predictions.
BACKGROUND: Accurate interpretations of cardiac functions require precise structural models of the myocardium, but the latter is not available always and for all species. Although scaling or substitution of myocardial fiber information from alternate species has been used in cardiac functional modeling, the validity of such practice has not been tested. METHODS: Fixed mouse (n = 10), rabbit (n = 6), and sheep (n = 5) hearts underwent diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). The myocardial structures in terms of the left ventricular fiber orientation helix angle index were quantitatively compared between the mouse rabbit and sheep hearts. RESULTS: The results show that significant fiber structural differences exist between any two of the three species. Specifically, the subepicardial fiber orientation, and the transmural range and linearity of fiber helix angles are significantly different between the mouse and either rabbit or sheep. Additionally, a significant difference was found between the transmural helix angle range between the rabbit and sheep. Across different circumferential regions of the heart, the fiber orientation was not found to be significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The current study indicates that myocardial structural differences exist between different size hearts. An immediate implication of the present findings for myocardial structural or functional modeling studies is that caution must be exercised when extrapolating myocardial structures from one species to another.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Healy et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: