Why the study?
Deep learning performance depends on loss functions, but guidance is needed to navigate the numerous loss functions developed to address specific data and model challenges.
This review provides a comprehensive guide to selecting appropriate loss functions for machine learning and deep learning applications, including experimental validation on ECG data.
Choosing suitable loss functions may enhance DL diagnostic performance in cardiology; leaves open which functions optimize specific cardiovascular tasks.
Deep learning (DL) is applied for solving a wide range of complex tasks such as, image recognition, natural language processing, segmentation, autonomous driving, and healthcare diagnostics. Its performance largely depends on loss functions, which measure deviation between predicted and actual values during training. So, selecting an appropriate loss function (also called cost-function) improves the success rate. Over the past few decades, researchers have developed many loss functions for ML and DL applications. Novel loss functions address issues such as imbalanced data, uncertain distributions, bounding box overlaps, and overfitting. In this paper, a comprehensive review of widely used 72 loss functions in ML and DL is discussed along with their pros and cons, mathematical representations, and limitations. They are also grouped based on their nature and applications. These loss functions were mainly categorized into classification, regression, ranking, margin based, GAN, and segmentation. This review paper incorporates experimental validation on paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ECG data to substantiate the discussion. A thorough analysis of traditional and recent loss functions is included to highlight their relative strengths in practical applications. This integrated perspective blends theoretical ideas and empirical evaluation, providing readers an in-depth understanding of current progress and future directions in the field of study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2025 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: