Key result
Patient-specific computational modeling of cardiac resynchronization therapy revealed that the optimal pacing strategy for improving acute hemodynamic and electrophysiological metrics is highly heterogeneous across patients.
Why the study?
Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves function in approximately 70% of patients, but identifying the optimal pacing strategy for a given patient remains challenging.
A novel computational framework integrating physics-based modeling with Bayesian personalization demonstrates proof-of-concept for simulating personalized CRT responses using non-invasive data.
Cardiac conduction disorders such as left bundle branch block induce ventricular dyssynchrony and increase the risk of heart failure. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves cardiac function in approximately 70% of patients; however, identifying the optimal pacing strategy for a given patient remains challenging. We present a computational framework that integrates physics-based modeling with Bayesian personalization to simulate cardiac electromechanical function and response to CRT. Patient anatomies are reconstructed from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and electrical activation is modeled using a 3D Eikonal formulation with probabilistic inference of the Purkinje network from ECG data via Bayesian optimization. This approach enables uncertainty quantification by identifying multiple activation patterns consistent with clinical observations. Electrical activation is coupled to a closed-loop cardiovascular model, calibrated using constrained Bayesian optimization to match CMR-derived volumetric measurements. The framework enables simulation of multiple pacing strategies and assessment of their acute hemodynamic effects while propagating electrophysiological uncertainty to mechanical outputs. As a proof of concept, the framework is evaluated in four heart failure patients spanning different clinical phenotypes, including differences in sex, cardiac dimensions and myocardial scar. Relying exclusively on non-invasive data and maintaining low computational cost, the proposed framework provides a scalable approach toward uncertainty-aware cardiac digital twins as a potential decision-support tool for evaluating personalized CRT strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergantin et al. (2026) studied Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and heart failure (n=4). Various cardiac resynchronization therapy pacing strategies (e.g., LBBP, BiVP) vs. LBBB baseline was evaluated on Electrophysiological and hemodynamic metrics (e.g., activation times, ESV, EF, MAP, max dP/dt, SW). Patient-specific computational modeling of cardiac resynchronization therapy revealed that the optimal pacing strategy for improving acute hemodynamic and electrophysiological metrics is highly heterogeneous across patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: