Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Preclinical study reveals heterogeneous, organ-specific CRISPR-Cas9 off-target cuts and translocations in mouse models, highlighting the need for localized safety assessments.
CRISPR-Cas9 holds promise for treating genetic disease, but rare off-target mutations and structural variants remain as key safety concerns, especially at scales relevant to therapy. Here, we establish workflows to resolve Cas9 off-target activity in vitro at single-cell resolution and in vivo across different tissues. Using clonally expanded electroporated mouse embryos and embryonic stem cells, we reveal that individual cells exhibit unique off-target and translocation profiles, including events missed in bulk analyses. Integrating single-cell editing with chromatin accessibility, transcription, and DNA methylation measurements suggest that sequence-independent features modulate Cas9 access and cleavage, with preferential editing in regions characterized by open chromatin and lower methylation. In Cas9-inducible mouse models, editing analyses reveal organ-distinct off-target spectra, DNA repair pathway usage, indel patterns, and markedly varying translocation propensity between tissues. These findings demonstrate that off-target activity is heterogeneous across cells and context-dependent across organs, motivating sensitive single-cell analyses and organ-specific evaluation in preclinical development to more accurately assess risk and improve the safety of CRISPR-based genomic medicines. CRISPR can treat genetic disease, but unintended DNA changes remain a safety concern. Here, authors show that off-target editing and translocations vary widely between individual cells and organs, motivating the development of more sensitive and organ-specific safety assays for CRISPR therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madsen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: