Observational analysis reveals contrasting links between merit-based versus repayment-based aid and academic performance in undergraduates, highlighting the moderating role of campus consumption.
Financial aid is central to higher education equity, yet its associations with academic outcomes may differ by aid type and students’ behavioural context. Drawing on expectancy-value theory, this study examines how merit-based and repayment-based aid are associated with academic performance, whether study effort mediates these associations, and whether campus consumption level moderates them. Using administrative data from 3,499 undergraduates at a Chinese ‘Double First-Class’ university, the findings show that merit-based aid is positively associated with academic performance, whereas repayment-based aid is negatively associated with it. Study effort partially mediates the merit-based aid–performance association. Higher campus consumption strengthens the negative associations of repayment-based aid with both performance and study effort, while weakening the positive association between merit-based aid and study effort but not its association with performance. These findings highlight heterogeneous relationships between financial aid and academic outcomes and provide implications for more targeted aid policies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: