Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-achieving, low-income students persist in higher education at lower rates than their high-income peers, raising questions about what drives these post-enrollment gaps. Most financial aid research examines the U.S. setting, despite many countries combining modest tuition with living cost support. I study a generous French merit-and-need grant using a regression discontinuity design. Because eligibility is communicated too late to affect enrollment, I can cleanly identify effects on already-enrolled students. I find precisely estimated null effects on persistence, degree completion, and graduate degree enrollment. These results suggest that high-achieving students may be less sensitive to financial aid than lower performing peers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gustave Kenedi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: