December 23, 2005Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic SurgeryOpen Access

Risk-adjusted morbidity, mortality and failure-to-rescue models for internal provider profiling after major lung resection

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Population

1,062 patients submitted to lobectomy (n=845) or pneumonectomy (n=217) from 1994 through 2004 at a single unit

Design

Cohort

Follow-up

30-day or in-hospital

Authors

ABAlessandro BrunelliSemmelweis University

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Risk-adjusted models may enhance internal quality profiling after lung resection; supports development but leaves external validity and practice change open.

Structured PICO

Population

1,062 patients submitted to lobectomy (n=845) or pneumonectomy (n=217) from 1994 through 2004 at a single unit

Intervention

Risk-adjusted models of 30-day or in-hospital morbidity, mortality and failure-to-rescue

Outcome

30-day or in-hospital morbidity, mortality and failure-to-rescue (death/complication ratio)hard clinical

Risk-adjusted outcome models for major lung resection provide more accurate internal quality-of-care profiling than unadjusted analyses.

Cite This Study

Alessandro Brunelli (2005) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9299346cd82e562097a6aa https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2005.118703

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Risk-adjusted models may enhance internal quality profiling after lung resection; supports development but leaves external validity and practice change open.

Risk-adjusted morbidity, mortality and failure-to-rescue models for internal provider profiling after major lung resection

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

Risk-adjusted morbidity, mortality and failure-to-rescue models for internal provider profiling after major lung resection

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider