Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 29, 2026Veterinary SurgeryOpen Access

Open versus minimally invasive surgical techniques for displaced abomasum in dairy cattle: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

UCUygur CANATANVAVildan Aslan

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Systematic review and meta-analysis finds minimally invasive abomasal displacement surgery lowers mortality in dairy cattle, indicating benefits remain unconfirmed by randomized trials.

Key Points

  • To compare the effectiveness and operative efficiency of open versus minimally invasive surgical approaches for managing abomasal displacement in dairy cattle.
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines searching PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science through May 2025.
  • Included 10 comparative studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 7 nonrandomized studies) evaluating 2900 dairy cows with abomasal displacement.
  • Calculated risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) using random-effects models in RevMan to evaluate mortality, operative time, recurrence, complications, and milk yield.
  • Pooled analysis of all 10 studies showed minimally invasive surgery was associated with lower mortality (RR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.50-0.84; p = .001) and higher postoperative milk yield (MD = 1.76 kg/day; 95% CI 1.31-2.22; p < .00001).
  • Sensitivity analysis limited to the 3 randomized controlled trials found no mortality difference between surgical approaches (RR = 1.27; 95% CI 0.39-4.07; p = .69).
  • Operative time, recurrence rates, and postoperative complications did not significantly differ between open and minimally invasive techniques.

Cite This Study

CANATAN et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a92997e8e5d7d1fc0c11808https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.70150
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share