Key result
Machine learning predicts EF from PLAX views with ~7% absolute error, improving when adding A4C.
Why the study?
No parasternal long-axis echocardiography datasets previously existed for predicting left ventricular ejection fraction, limiting estimation in situations where standard apical views are not feasible.
Does a machine learning model accurately predict left ventricular ejection fraction from parasternal long-axis (PLAX) echocardiography videos?
Does a machine learning model accurately predict left ventricular ejection fraction from parasternal long-axis (PLAX) echocardiography videos?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Machine learning can accurately estimate left ventricular ejection fraction from parasternal long-axis echocardiography views, providing a clinically relevant alternative when apical views are not feasible.
We present, to the best of our knowledge, the first publicly available resource for predicting left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) from parasternal long-axis (PLAX) echocardiography. Because no PLAX–EF datasets previously existed, our work focuses on an innovative data generation strategy to overcome this scarcity. By leveraging a time-based correlation between clinical notes and echocardiographic videos, combined with fine-tuning view classifiers and proxy labeling, we created a labeled dataset of over 25,000 PLAX videos. This enables us to train the first reproducible PLAX EF model, achieving a mean absolute error (MAE) of 6.86%. Given that apical four-chamber (A4C) methods, the clinical standard, report MAE values of 6%-7%, our results demonstrate that EF estimation from PLAX views is both feasible and clinically relevant. This surpasses the performance of existing methods and provides a clinically relevant solution for situations where apical views may not be feasible. Going further, we demonstrate that combining PLAX and A4C predictions via simple unweighted late fusion improves both single-view baselines to a 6.37% MAE, underscoring the value of multi-view integration. To promote continued research, we release the dataset labels, trained models, and runnable demos on GitHub, Hugging Face, and Google Colab: https://github.com/Jeffrey4899/PLAX_EF_Labels_202509
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied Left ventricular ejection fraction prediction (n=5,117). Machine learning model for PLAX ejection fraction prediction vs. Apical four-chamber (A4C) clinical standard models was evaluated on Mean absolute error (MAE) of ejection fraction prediction. A machine learning model predicting ejection fraction from parasternal long-axis echocardiography achieved a mean absolute error of 6.86%, which further improved to 6.37% when combined with apical four-chamber views.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: