Qualitative case study reveals how informal intellectual networks enabled cross-ideological student mobilization in Bangladesh, highlighting the role of decentralized infrastructural authority.
In July 2024, Bangladesh experienced a large-scale, cross-ideological student mobilization that unfolded without visible charismatic leadership or formal organizational command. This article explores how such a broad-based uprising became possible in a political environment characterized by coercive campus governance, ideological fragmentation, and deep mistrust of established student organizations. Drawing on a qualitative, interpretive case-study of the July mobilization, the article advances the concept of incipient intellectuals to explain how long-term, low-visibility intellectual practices enabled rapid collective action at the moment of rupture. Using process tracing, qualitative content analysis, and in-depth interviews with participants involved in campus-based study circles, editorial platforms, cultural initiatives, and hybrid protest forms between 2018 and 2024, the study shows how sustained intellectual labor generated infrastructural authority . This form of authority rests not on positional leadership or ideological dominance, but on consistency, interpretive competence, ethical boundary-setting, and cross-ideological translation. The findings demonstrate that incipient intellectuals functioned as trusted relay nodes across fragmented ideological pockets, enabling coordination despite the lack of ideological convergence or partisan capture. Conceptually, the article refines Gramscian theories of intellectuals, extends elite theory, and contributes to social movement scholarship by demonstrating the political significance of long-term intellectual infrastructures in the context of repression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mostofa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: