Numerical modeling reveals that compressibility and velocity dominate peak slamming overloads during high-speed water entry, suggesting key protective design strategies for hydroballistic vehicles.
Trans-medium vehicles, including supercavitating torpedoes, submarine-launched projectiles, and high-speed hydroballistic bodies, demonstrate increasingly diverse applications in crossing the air–water interface. For such vehicles, the truncated-cone (flat-headed) configuration represents a geometry of significant engineering relevance, as it is widely adopted in the nose sections of supercavitating projectiles and certain underwater ballistic penetrators where the flat head promotes rapid vaporization and cavity generation during high-speed water entry. The air-to-water transition process typically generates extreme hydrodynamic impact loads due to complex multiphase flow and fluid–structure coupling interactions, with water compressibility playing a significant role under hydroballistic conditions. This study focuses on the water-entry regime at velocities ranging from 300 to 1100 m/s, corresponding to hydroballistic speeds relevant to supercavitating vehicles (e.g., the Shkval torpedo operates at approximately 370 m/s) and the initial impact phase of high-speed trans-medium projectiles. Parametric studies are conducted with varying entry velocities (Mach 0.20~0.73 in water), impact angles, and structural dimensions to systematically investigate their effects on the peak slamming overload, using a dynamic mesh technique coupled with a VOF multiphase model with compressibility effects for both air and water phases. The results demonstrate that compressibility effects induce a pronounced air cushion effect during water impact, wherein compression waves generated during high-speed entry dominate the load formation process. Velocity is identified as the most sensitive factor affecting peak overload, followed by structural size parameters. The findings provide valuable guidance for the protective design of high-speed water-entry structures operating in the hydroballistic regime.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: