Why the study?
Does the blood collection procedure influence spontaneous platelet aggregation measured by laser light scattering in healthy subjects?
Does the blood collection procedure influence spontaneous platelet aggregation measured by laser light scattering in healthy subjects?
Standardization of blood collection procedures, including needle gauge and tourniquet use, is essential for accurate measurement of spontaneous platelet aggregation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Blood draw technique may confound spontaneous platelet aggregation assays; leaves open whether standardization improves reliability in research or practice.
Platelet aggregometry by the laser light scattering (LS) method is sufficiently sensitive to detect small platelet aggregates that form spontaneously in vitro in the absence of agonists. Platelet aggregation without agonists is named spontaneous platelet aggregation (SPA). Since SPA has been suggested to be associated with various thrombotic diseases, it is essential to measure SPA and to establish a standard range of SPA values. In this study, we measured SPA in 167 healthy subjects by the LS method and attempted to clarify various factors influencing SPA, including the blood collection procedure. We also attempted to establish a tentative standard range of SPA values. SPA was quantitatively measured in terms of the maximum total LS intensity, which reflects small aggregates formed over 10 minutes (SMAX) and the area under the total LS intensity curve of small aggregates (SAUC). Since both the values of SMAX and SAUC were skewed and the log SMAX and log AUC values showed a normal distribution, the statistical analyses were performed using log SMAX and log SAUC. The log SMAX and log SAUC were significantly higher in the samples collected using a tourniquet and/or a 21 G needle, than in those collected without a tourniquet and/or with an 18 G needle. The log SAUC values were significantly lower in samples obtained with a syringe and/or 3.8% sodium citrate than in those obtained in vacuum sampling tubes and/or 3.13% or 3.14% sodium citrate. The Ht and plasma glucose concentration influenced the log SMAX values. We propose that to standardize SPA measurements, the measurements should be completed within two hours of blood sample collection and collected using the regular concentration of citrate. The standard range of SMAX values measured in samples obtained using a tourniquet and a 21 G needle was 2.0-23.99 (*10(3) mV*count). The standard range of SAUC values measured under same conditions was 0.58-9.12 (*10(6) mV*count*min). The standard range of SMAX values measured in samples obtained using a tourniquet, 21 G needle and a vacuum tube was 1.7-29.51 (*10(3) mV*count). The standard range of SAUC values measured under same conditions was 0.59-9.33 (*10(6) mV*count*min).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toshima et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: