Why the study?
Does local intra-arterial fibrinolysis with rtPA improve recanalization and clinical outcomes in patients with thromboemboli during neuroendovascular procedures?
Does local intra-arterial fibrinolysis with rtPA improve recanalization and clinical outcomes in patients with thromboemboli during neuroendovascular procedures?
Local intra-arterial fibrinolysis with rtPA for thromboemboli during neuroendovascular procedures yielded unsatisfactory recanalization rates and clinical outcomes, highlighting the need for better preventive and therapeutic strategies.
Case series cautions against routine intra-arterial rtPA for procedural emboli; leaves open need for better prevention and therapies.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is a lack of systematic data regarding local intra-arterial fibrinolysis (LIF) of thromboemboli occurring during neuroendovascular procedures with the use of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA). We report our technique for treating LIF of intracerebral thromboemboli occurring during neuroendovascular procedures. METHODS: Nine of 723 patients (1.2%) who underwent neuroendovascular procedures during the period from January 1997 to September 2002 suffered thromboembolic complications. These patients were treated by LIF with a maximum dose of 0.9 mg rtPA per kilogram body weight. Recanalization was categorized as successful (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] grade 2 or 3) versus unsuccessful (TIMI grade 0 or 1), and clinical outcome was categorized as independent (Rankin Scale score 0 to 2) versus dependent or dead (Rankin Scale score 3 to 6). RESULTS: The minimum time between thrombus detection and beginning of LIF was 10 minutes, and the maximum time was 90 minutes. Successful recanalization was achieved in 4 of 9 patients (44%). All 9 patients suffered cerebral ischemic infarctions, and none of the patients sustained intracerebral hemorrhage. Two patients (22%) died from malignant brain infarctions. Four patients (44%) remained moderately disabled, and 3 patients (33%) were severely disabled 3 months after LIF. CONCLUSIONS: Although we used relatively high doses of rtPA, the recanalization rates and clinical outcome of LIF in our patients were not satisfactory. Strategies for the prevention of thromboemboli during neuroendovascular procedures must be improved, and novel fibrinolytic or thrombolytic techniques should be developed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hähnel et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: