Key result
Nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation significantly enhanced quality of life and functional capacity, and demonstrated an 8-10% absolute risk reduction in hospital readmissions compared to routine care.
Why the study?
Despite increasing adoption of nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation models, their impact compared to routine care remains uncertain.
Does nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation improve quality of life, functional capacity, and clinical outcomes in adults with cardiovascular disease compared to routine care?
Population
922 adults with established cardiovascular disease across 6 RCTs
Comparison
Nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation vs routine or usual care
Design
Systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Authors
Loading...
Supports integration of nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation into routine care; confirms benefits across quality-of-life, capacity, and readmission endpoints.
Systematic Review (n=922)
Does nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation improve quality of life, functional capacity, and clinical outcomes in adults with cardiovascular disease compared to routine care?
Nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation is an effective model of care that significantly enhances quality of life and functional capacity in adults with cardiovascular disease compared to routine care.
Halili et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Cardiovascular disease (n=922). Nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation vs. Routine care was evaluated on Quality of life, functional capacity, hospital readmissions, and mortality. Nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation significantly enhanced quality of life and functional capacity, and demonstrated an 8-10% absolute risk reduction in hospital readmissions compared to routine care.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: