Key result
Cardiac angiosarcoma carries a ~91% overall mortality rate.
Why the study?
Cardiac angiosarcoma is a rare, highly aggressive malignancy, making it critical to understand its epidemiology and factors influencing mortality.
Cohort (n=194)
Cardiac angiosarcoma is associated with a highly aggressive clinical course and a 91% mortality rate, with advanced age, distant disease, and lack of local therapy driving worse outcomes.
May guide prognostic counseling in cardiac angiosarcoma; leaves open prospective validation of multimodal strategies.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac angiosarcoma is a rare, highly aggressive malignancy arising from endothelial cells of the heart and accounts for ∼30% of primary cardiac tumors. Understanding its epidemiology and factors influencing mortality is critical, and emerging genomic data may inform personalized management. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was utilized to gather data from 2000 to 2021. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients were identified (102 males and 92 females). Most patients were ≤50 years (59%), with a slightly higher incidence among Black patients (18%). Overall mortality was high, with 91% of patients dying and a mean survival of 15 months. The 1-year overall survival rate was 0.461 (95% CI: 0.39-0.53). Larger tumors (>10 cm) and higher tumor grade were associated with increased mortality. Multivariate analysis showed that age 51-70 years (hazard ratio [HR] 0.57; CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac angiosarcoma carries a high mortality rate. Advanced age, distant disease, and lack of surgery or radiation therapy were associated with increased mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ullah et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Cardiac angiosarcoma (n=194). Patient demographics and tumor characteristics was evaluated on 1-year overall survival (95% CI 0.39-0.53). Among patients with cardiac angiosarcoma, overall mortality was 91%, with a 1-year overall survival rate of 46.1% (95% CI 0.39-0.53) and a mean survival of 15 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: