Key result
Surgery plus other therapies for cardiac angiosarcoma is linked to ~14 months longer survival vs surgery alone.
Why the study?
The authors sought to investigate the role of surgery in cardiac angiosarcoma, identify late mortality predictors, and evaluate interactions with other treatment modalities using a national dataset.
Does surgery combined with other modalities improve overall survival compared to surgery alone in patients with primary cardiac angiosarcoma?
Population
130 patients with primary cardiac angiosarcoma undergoing surgery from the National Cancer Database
Comparison
Surgery in combination with other modalities vs surgery alone
Design
Retrospective database cohort study
Follow-up
Median 72.02 months
Authors
Loading...
Multimodal therapy may extend survival after surgery for cardiac angiosarcoma; this Level 5 analysis leaves open the need for prospective trials.
Cohort (n=130)
Yes
Does surgery combined with other modalities improve overall survival compared to surgery alone in patients with primary cardiac angiosarcoma?
Absolute Event Rate: 17.28% vs 2.88%
p-value: p=0.018
In patients with primary cardiac angiosarcoma, combining surgery with other therapeutic modalities significantly improves overall survival compared to surgery alone.
Rahouma et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Primary cardiac angiosarcoma (n=130). Surgery in combination with other modalities vs. Surgery alone was evaluated on Median overall survival (months) (p=0.018). Surgery combined with other modalities for primary cardiac angiosarcoma was associated with a significantly longer median overall survival compared to surgery alone (17.28 vs 2.88 months, p=0.018).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: