Key result
ECG-gated multidetector-row computed tomography enables rapid and specific diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes by significantly reducing motion artifacts and differentiating various aortic pathologies.
Why the study?
Different types of acute aortic syndromes share indistinguishable clinical presentations and require prompt, specific diagnosis to guide management.
This review highlights ECG-gated MDCT as the imaging modality of choice for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes in emergency settings.
May support ECG-gated MDCT for AAS emergencies; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Acute aortic syndromes (AAS) encompass a spectrum of life-threatening conditions characterized by acute aortic pain. AAS include acute aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, and aneurysm rupture. The prognosis of AAS is clearly related to prompt diagnosis and appropriate management. The different types of AAS cannot be reliably differentiated solely based on clinical presentation since the clinical features are indistinguishable. Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) with electrocardiographic gating (ECG-gated MDCT) has been used in the acute emergency setting as a powerful clinical tool, which enables rapid and specific diagnosis of aortic pathologies. ECG-gated MDCT significantly reduces motion artifact and avoids potential pitfalls in the diagnosis of AAS. The aim of this review is to evaluate the role of MDCT imaging in the assessment of AAS and to discuss the differentiation of this spectrum of aortic diseases with reference to the key imaging findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duran et al. (2019) conducted a review in Acute aortic syndromes. Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) was evaluated. ECG-gated multidetector-row computed tomography enables rapid and specific diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes by significantly reducing motion artifacts and differentiating various aortic pathologies.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: