Key result
In 416 patients with multiple myeloma, DOAC thromboprophylaxis was associated with VTE rates ranging from 0% to 23.5% and major bleeding from 0% to 4.5%, with very low certainty of evidence.
Why the study?
Venous thromboembolism risk remains high in multiple myeloma despite current thromboprophylaxis recommendations, while direct oral anticoagulants have shown promising results in other malignancies.
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) prevent venous thromboembolism in patients with multiple myeloma?
Systematic Review (n=416)
Do direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) prevent venous thromboembolism in patients with multiple myeloma?
Current evidence for DOAC thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma is of very low certainty and insufficient to recommend routine use.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Insufficient evidence precludes routine DOAC thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma; leaves open whether RCTs would support adoption.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. Current guidelines recommend aspirin or low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis depending on VTE risk. Nevertheless, VTE risks remain high: a recent meta-analysis reported an incidence of 6.2% during the entire MM course. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) showed promising results in other malignancies. This systematic review provides an overview of evidence on DOAC thromboprophylaxis in MM. PubMed and Embase were searched up to November 21, 2023, for studies evaluating MM and DOAC thromboprophylaxis (PROSPERO: CRD42022376152). Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and texts, assessed bias using a modified version of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and certainty of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, and performed data extraction and analysis. Seven articles comprising 416 patients with DOAC thromboprophylaxis were included, primarily involving newly diagnosed patients with MM (56.3%) receiving lenalidomide-based regimens (69.1%). Overall Newcastle Ottawa Scale study quality was moderate. Four studies reported follow-up duration ranging from 90 days after induction to 7 months. VTE proportions ranged from 0% to 23.5%, with 4 studies reporting 0%. The proportions of minor, clinically relevant nonmajor, and major bleeding ranged from 0% to 18.2%, 0% to 7.7%, and 0% to 4.5%, respectively. Arterial thrombosis proportions ranged from 0% to 2.9%. Only 2 studies reported on mortality (2% and 7.1%). Overall Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. Current evidence regarding routine DOACs in MM is insufficient, warranting further research to establish the DOAC thromboprophylaxis risk-to-benefit ratio in MM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Codreanu et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Multiple myeloma (n=416). Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was evaluated on Venous thromboembolism (VTE). In 416 patients with multiple myeloma, DOAC thromboprophylaxis was associated with VTE rates ranging from 0% to 23.5% and major bleeding from 0% to 4.5%, with very low certainty of evidence.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: