Key result
The SLIP-2 score outperformed the original SLIP score for predicting postoperative ARDS (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.81-0.88 vs AUC 0.56, 95% CI 0.50-0.62).
Why the study?
Does the SLIP-2 score improve prediction of postoperative ARDS compared to the original SLIP score in high-risk surgical patients?
Population
1,562 at-risk surgical patients from a multicenter, prospective cohort
Comparison
SLIP-2 risk prediction model vs Original SLIP score
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
May aid preoperative ARDS risk stratification in surgery; extends SLIP but leaves open prospective validation and impact.
Cohort (n=1,562)
Yes
Does the SLIP-2 score improve prediction of postoperative ARDS compared to the original SLIP score in high-risk surgical patients?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.84 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.88)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.84% vs 0.56%
The SLIP-2 score provides a highly discriminative tool for identifying surgical patients at high risk for postoperative ARDS.
Kor et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in High-risk surgical patients at risk for ARDS (n=1,562). SLIP-2 score vs. Original SLIP score was evaluated on Prediction of postoperative ARDS (Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.88). The SLIP-2 score outperformed the original SLIP score for predicting postoperative ARDS (AUC 0.84, 95% CI 0.81-0.88 vs AUC 0.56, 95% CI 0.50-0.62).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: