Key result
Epicardial fat cell size was independently associated with age, BMI, and epicardial adipose tissue volume in males, whereas no clinical predictors of epicardial fat cell size could be identified in females.
Why the study?
Predictors of overall epicardial adipose tissue deposition vary by sex, but whether sex differences exist in epicardial fat cell morphology is unknown.
Observational (n=118)
No
Sex differences exist in the predictors of epicardial fat cell morphology, with BMI and age predicting fat cell size in males but not females, emphasizing the need for sex-specific analyses in cardiac adipose research.
Supports sex-specific analyses in cardiac adipose research; leaves open clinical relevance and cardiovascular outcome links.
Predictors of overall epicardial adipose tissue deposition have been found to vary between males and females. Whether similar sex differences exist in epicardial fat cell morphology is currently unknown. This study aimed to determine whether epicardial fat cell size is associated with different clinical measurements in males and females. Fat cell sizes were measured from epicardial, paracardial, and appendix adipose tissues of post-mortem cases (N= 118 total, 37 females). Epicardial, extra-pericardial, and visceral fat volumes were measured by computed tomography from a subset of cases (N= 70, 22 females). Correlation analyses and stepwise linear regression were performed to identify predictors of fat cell size in males and females. Median fat cell sizes in all depots did not differ between males and females. Body mass index (BMI) and age were independently predictive of epicardial, paracardial, and appendix fat cell sizes in males, but not in females. Epicardial and appendix fat cell sizes were associated with epicardial and visceral fat volumes, respectively, in males only. In females, paracardial fat cell size was associated with extra-pericardial fat volume, while appendix fat cell size was associated with BMI only. No predictors were associated with epicardial fat cell size in females at the univariable or multivariable levels. To conclude, no clinical measurements were useful surrogates of epicardial fat cell size in females, while BMI, age, and epicardial fat volume were independent, albeit weak, predictors in males only.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waddell et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Post-mortem cases (n=118). Clinical predictors (BMI, age, epicardial fat volume) vs. Male vs Female was evaluated on Predictors of epicardial fat cell size. Epicardial fat cell size was independently associated with age, BMI, and epicardial adipose tissue volume in males, whereas no clinical predictors of epicardial fat cell size could be identified in females.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: