Key result
The systolic time interval Q-V peak measured by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography showed a highly significant negative correlation with left ventricular ejection fraction (r = -0.84, p<0.001).
Why the study?
Does the Q-V peak interval measured by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography correlate with LVEF in patients with acute myocardial infarction and angina pectoris?
Observational (n=51)
Does the Q-V peak interval measured by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography correlate with LVEF in patients with acute myocardial infarction and angina pectoris?
The Q-V peak interval measured by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography provides a bedside evaluation of left ventricular performance that correlates strongly with LVEF in patients with coronary artery disease.
Left ventricular performance was evaluated in 51 patients with acute myocardial infarction and angina pectoris using parameters derived from the flow velocity waveform at the ascending aorta. Flow velocity waveforms were obtained from the suprasternal notch by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography and were recorded on a line-scan recorder at a paper speed of 100 mm/sec with lead II ECG. The peak flow velocity and the systolic time interval from the beginning of ECG Q wave to the peak flow velocity (Q-V peak interval) were measured. Relationships were investigated between these parameters and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) obtained from multigated equilibrium blood pool imaging with 99mTc-pertechnetate. The peak flow velocity did not correlate with LVEF (r = 0.27). However, a highly significant negative correlation was observed between the systolic time interval Q-V peak and LVEF (r = -0.84, p less than 0.001). The regression equation was LVEF = -0.46 X (Q-V peak) + 142. We conclude that left ventricular performance can be evaluated in patients with coronary artery disease at the bedside using the Q-V peak interval measured from simultaneous recording of the velocity waveform at the ascending aorta and the ECG.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohte et al. (1991) conducted an observational in Acute myocardial infarction and angina pectoris (n=51). Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography (Q-V peak interval) vs. Multigated equilibrium blood pool imaging (LVEF) was evaluated on Correlation between Q-V peak interval and LVEF (r = -0.84, p=<0.001). The systolic time interval Q-V peak measured by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography showed a highly significant negative correlation with left ventricular ejection fraction (r = -0.84, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: