Why the study?
Does noninvasive measurement of peak aortic blood acceleration using a continuous-wave Doppler velocity meter improve the evaluation of global left ventricular performance in patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization?
Does noninvasive measurement of peak aortic blood acceleration using a continuous-wave Doppler velocity meter improve the evaluation of global left ventricular performance in patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization?
Peak aortic blood acceleration measured noninvasively with continuous-wave Doppler correlates strongly with ejection fraction and is a useful indicator of global left ventricular performance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support noninvasive LV assessment in cath patients; leaves open prospective validation of incremental value over EF.
Peak aortic blood acceleration is recognized to be a sensitive index of global left ventricular performance. In the present study peak acceleration was assessed noninvasively in patients with a continuous-wave Doppler velocity meter. Peak aortic blood velocity and peak blood acceleration were measured by placing the ultrasonic transducer at the suprasternal notch. Measurements were obtained in 36 patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Peak velocity and acceleration were measured at rest just before left ventriculography. In patients with ejection fractions greater than 60%, peak acceleration was 19 +/- 5 m/sec/sec. In patients with ejection fractions of 41% to 60%, peak acceleration was lower, at 12 +/- 2 m/sec/sec (p less than .001). In patients with ejection fractions of 40% or less, peak acceleration (8 +/- 2 m/sec/sec) was markedly lower than in patients with ejection fractions greater than 60% (p less than .001). Peak acceleration showed a good linear correlation with ejection fraction (r = .90), and a better power fit (r = .93). These results indicate that peak acceleration, measured noninvasively with a continuous-wave Doppler velocity meter, is a useful indicator of global left ventricular performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sabbah et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: