Key result
Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was lower in survived versus deceased heart failure patients (SMD -0.592, P<0.001), but did not significantly associate with mortality risk (HR 1.02, P=0.289).
Why the study?
Inflammation plays a role in heart failure pathogenesis, but the role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a novel prognostic biomarker needed investigation.
Does platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) predict mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=13,924)
Does platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) predict mortality and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 1.02 (95% CI 0.99–1.05)
p-value: p=0.289
Although PLR is lower in surviving heart failure patients compared to those who die, it does not significantly predict mortality risk and should be used with caution for prognosis.
PLR should not inform HF mortality prognosis in practice; leaves open its biomarker role pending prospective validation.
Background: Inflammation has been suggested to play a role in heart failure (HF) pathogenesis. However, the role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), as a novel biomarker, to assess HF prognosis needs to be investigated. We sought to evaluate the impact of PLR on HF clinical outcomes. Methods: English-published records in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web-of-science databases were screened until December 2023. Relevant articles evaluated PLR with clinical outcomes (including mortality, rehospitalization, HF worsening, and HF detection) were recruited, with PLR difference analysis based on death/survival status in total and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients. Results: In total, 21 articles ( n = 13,924) were selected. The total mean age was 70.36 ± 12.88 years (males: 61.72%). Mean PLR was 165.54 [95% confidence interval (CI): 154.69–176.38]. In total, 18 articles ( n = 10,084) reported mortality [either follow-up (PLR: 162.55, 95% CI: 149.35–175.75) or in-hospital (PLR: 192.83, 95% CI: 150.06–235.61) death rate] and the mean PLR was 166.68 (95% CI: 154.87–178.50). Further analysis revealed PLR was significantly lower in survived HF patients rather than deceased group (152.34, 95% CI: 134.01–170.68 versus 194.73, 95% CI: 175.60–213.85, standard mean difference: −0.592, 95% CI: −0.857 to −0.326, p < 0.001). A similar trend was observed for HFrEF patients. PLR failed to show any association with mortality risk (hazard ratio: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.99–1.05, p = 0.289). Analysis of other aforementioned outcomes was not possible due to the presence of few studies of interest. Conclusion: PLR should be used with caution for prognosis assessment in HF sufferers and other studies are necessary to explore the exact association.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vakhshoori et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure (n=13,924). Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) was evaluated on Mortality risk (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.99-1.05, p=0.289). Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was lower in survived versus deceased heart failure patients (SMD -0.592, P<0.001), but did not significantly associate with mortality risk (HR 1.02, P=0.289).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: